Rae Cooper

1.5k citations
62 papers · 941 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Rae Cooper

53 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

Rae Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Public Administration 372
  • Gender Studies 228
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 139
  • General Health Professions 314
  • Sociology and Political Science 448
Replace Heidi Gottfried with:
Heidi Gottfried United States
Daniel B. Cornfield United States
Deborah M. Figart United States
Kevin Stainback United States
Rachel Sherman United States
Jonathan Payne United Kingdom
Anna Pollert United Kingdom
Jon Van Til United States
Gail M. McGuire United States
Ken-Hou Lin United States
Rae Cooper relative to Heidi Gottfried United States Heidi Gottfried's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Heidi Gottfried · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rae Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rae Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rae Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rae Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rae Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rae Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rae Cooper. The network helps show where Rae Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rae Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rae Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Rae Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017124
2 200885
3 201566
4 201664
5 200345
6 201244
7 201841
8 200837
9 202136
10 202036
11 200832
12 200322
13 202120
14 200620
15 201720
16 201418
17
Women and WorkChoices: impacts on the low pay sector
200718
18 200116
19 200914
20 201014

About Rae Cooper

Rae Cooper is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 62 papers that have together received 941 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (34 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (22 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (15 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (10 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (9 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers) and Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (372 citations), Gender Studies (228 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (139 citations), General Health Professions (314 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (448 citations). Rae Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Marian Baird, Bradon Ellem, Meraiah Foley, Peter Berg, Jennifer Tomlinson, Bob S. Carter, Chris Briggs, Sue Williamson, Sarah Oxenbridge and Diane van den Broek. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial Relations, Labour History, Gender Work and Organization, The Economic and Labour Relations Review and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact