Peter Quain

8 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Peter Quain
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 352
  • Statistics and Probability 102
  • Education 221
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 91
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 73
Replace Fernando César Capovilla with:
Fernando César Capovilla Brazil
Jill K. Duthie United States
Lorna Bourke United Kingdom
Claudia Mähler Germany
Amy Skinner United States
Lap‐Yan Lo China
Merilee McCurdy United States
Barbara M. Fulk United States
Russell Matthews Australia
Andree Hartanto Singapore
Peter Quain relative to Fernando César Capovilla Brazil Fernando César Capovilla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Fernando César Capovilla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Quain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Quain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Quain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Quain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Quain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Quain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Quain. The network helps show where Peter Quain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter Quain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Quain Line = papers co-authored together Peter Quain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2002101
2 200595
3 200691
4 200589
5
Preliminary results from a longitudinal preschool twin study of early reading development
200246
6 201422
7 200915
8
Longitudinal twin study of literacy and language : The first three years
20053

About Peter Quain

Peter Quain is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Education, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (1 paper) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (352 citations), Statistics and Probability (102 citations), Education (221 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (73 citations). Peter Quain has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Samuelsson, Sally J. Wadsworth, Brian Byrne, Richard K. Olson, John C. DeFries, Robin P. Corley, Erik G. Willcutt, Ruth Fielding‐Barnsley, Torleiv Høien and Jacqueline Hulslander. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Dyslexia, Reading and Writing, Scientific Studies of Reading, Archives of Sexual Behavior and Journal of Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact