Peter McCrorie

1.9k citations
47 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter McCrorie

45 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter McCrorie
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Family Practice 297
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.0k
  • General Health Professions 438
  • Gender Studies 157
  • Health Information Management 67
Replace Ming‐Jung Ho with:
Ming‐Jung Ho Taiwan
Amy Baernstein United States
Wayne Woloschuk Canada
Valmae Ypinazar Australia
Hudson Birden Australia
Alicia D. Monroe United States
Linda D. Boyd United States
Cynthia C. Gadbury‐Amyot United States
Penny Salvatori Canada
Gellisse Bagnall United Kingdom
Peter McCrorie relative to Ming‐Jung Ho Taiwan Ming‐Jung Ho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ming‐Jung Ho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter McCrorie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter McCrorie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter McCrorie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter McCrorie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter McCrorie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter McCrorie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter McCrorie. The network helps show where Peter McCrorie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter McCrorie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter McCrorie Line = papers co-authored together Peter McCrorie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000209
2 2011171
3 2002160
4 2002117
5 200276
6 200464
7 200156
8 201245
9 198745
10 200441
11 200140
12 200930
13 199428
14 200127
15 198625
16 200924
17 199424
18 200117
19 201417
20 200114

About Peter McCrorie

Peter McCrorie is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Education, Health Information Management and Epidemiology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (34 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (13 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (8 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (7 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (5 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (297 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.0k citations), General Health Professions (438 citations), Gender Studies (157 citations) and Health Information Management (67 citations). Peter McCrorie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lesley Southgate, David Perry, Della Freeth, Scott Reeves, I. C. McManus, Pauline McAvoy, Brian Jolly, Richard Hays, L J M Caldon and Albert J.J.A. Scherpbier. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, Journal of Comparative Pathology and Biochemical Society Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact