BMC Medical Education

7.1k papers and 107.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.1k papers published in BMC Medical Education in the last decades have received a total of 107.2k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Medical Education usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (4.4k papers), General Health Professions (2.3k papers) and Education (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (3.7k papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1.1k papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (850 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Medical Education are Annette Burgess, Chung Kwan Lo, Khe Foon Hew, Chris Roberts, Craig Mellis, I. C. McManus, Dragan Ilić, Cees van der Vleuten, Maged N. Kamel Boulos and Steve Wheeler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Medical Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Medical Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Medical Education.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Medical Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Medical Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Medical Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Medical Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025