Paul Deane

3.2k citations
94 papers · 1.8k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Deane

89 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Paul Deane
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 717
  • Language and Linguistics 426
  • Literature and Literary Theory 323
  • Education 795
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 41
Replace Philip M. McCarthy with:
Philip M. McCarthy United States
Zhiqiang Cai United States
David Coniam Hong Kong
Rui A. Alves Portugal
Jack Burston Cyprus
Hilary Nesi United Kingdom
Mike Levy Australia
Jerry Andriessen Netherlands
Willy A. Renandya Singapore
Detmar Meurers Germany
Paul Deane relative to Philip M. McCarthy United States Philip M. McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Philip M. McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Deane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Deane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Deane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Deane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Deane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Deane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Deane. The network helps show where Paul Deane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Deane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Deane Line = papers co-authored together Paul Deane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012155
2 200894
3 199287
4 199187
5 200560
6 200857
7 199254
8 201454
9 201449
10 201146
11 199244
12 200643
13 198838
14 201235
15 201634
16 201933
17 201830
18 201530
19 201929
20 201829

About Paul Deane

Paul Deane is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Writing and Handwriting Education (36 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (17 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (15 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (13 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (13 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (10 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (10 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (717 citations), Language and Linguistics (426 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (323 citations), Education (795 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (41 citations). Paul Deane has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Song Yi, Mo Zhang, Peter W. van Rijn, John Sabatini, Randy Elliot Bennett, Tenaha O’Reilly, Thomas Quinlan, Mary E. Fowles, Kathleen M. Sheehan and Mo Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Measurement, Language, Educational Assessment, Educational Measurement Issues and Practice and Educational Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact