Educational Assessment

431 papers and 8.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 431 papers published in Educational Assessment in the last decades have received a total of 8.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Educational Assessment usually cover Education (324 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (84 papers) specifically the topics of Student Assessment and Feedback (141 papers), Measurement Invariance in Structural Equation Modeling (74 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Educational Assessment are Christine E. DeMars, Steven L. Wise, Jamal Abedi, Philip M. Sadler, Dylan Wiliam, Erin Marie Furtak, Stephen G. Sireci, Drew H. Gitomer, Maria Araceli Ruiz‐Primo and Robert W. Roeser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Educational Assessment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Educational Assessment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Educational Assessment.

Countries where authors publish in Educational Assessment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Educational Assessment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Educational Assessment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational Assessment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025