David Coniam

2.2k citations
100 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

David Coniam

84 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

David Coniam
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Language and Linguistics 581
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 441
  • Literature and Literary Theory 382
  • Health Informatics 29
  • Communication 158
Replace Deborah Healey with:
Deborah Healey Australia
Aek Phakiti Australia
Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan Malaysia
Nicky Hockly United States
Barry Lee Reynolds Macao
Mike Levy Australia
Mark Pegrum Australia
Jeong‐Bae Son Australia
Sara Cushing Weigle United States
Jack Burston Cyprus
David Coniam relative to Deborah Healey Australia Deborah Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Deborah Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Coniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Coniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Coniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Coniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Coniam. The network helps show where David Coniam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside David Coniam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Coniam Line = papers co-authored together David Coniam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 100 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008257
2 2020147
3 2013134
4 2001106
5 201499
6 199678
7 199961
8 200854
9 200437
10 200229
11 200925
12 201224
13 200623
14 200923
15 199822
16 200221
17 201321
18 200420
19 200520
20
Computer-Mediated Communication and Teacher Education: The Case of "Telenex.".
199418

About David Coniam

David Coniam is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (34 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (21 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (19 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (10 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Educational Technology and Assessment (10 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (6 papers) and Subtitles and Audiovisual Media (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (581 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (441 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (382 citations), Health Informatics (29 citations) and Communication (158 citations). David Coniam has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Greece and China. Frequent co-authors include Barley Mak, Icy Lee, Luke K. Fryer, Zi Yan, Zhao Wen, Yangyu Xiao, Christopher G. Dowson, Peter Bodycott, Allan Walker and Angel M. Y. Lin. Their work appears in journals such as System, CALICO Journal, ReCALL, BioTechniques and Educational Research and Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact