David Coniam

2.2k citations
86 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

David Coniam

71 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David Coniam
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Language and Linguistics 471
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 385
  • Literature and Literary Theory 326
  • Communication 144
  • Health Informatics 25
Replace Deborah Healey with:
Deborah Healey Australia
Barry Lee Reynolds Macao
Mike Levy Australia
Jack Burston Cyprus
Saman Ebadi Iran
Nicky Hockly United States
Wen‐Ta Tseng Taiwan
Hilary Nesi United Kingdom
Glenn Stockwell Japan
Sara Cushing Weigle United States
David Coniam relative to Deborah Healey Australia Deborah Healey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Deborah Healey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Coniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Coniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Coniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Coniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Coniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Coniam. The network helps show where David Coniam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside David Coniam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Coniam Line = papers co-authored together David Coniam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008216
2 2020131
3 2013120
4 200187
5 201483
6 199669
7 199950
8 200847
9 200435
10 200923
11 200222
12 200621
13 199820
14 200419
15 200519
16 200919
17 201218
18
Computer-Mediated Communication and Teacher Education: The Case of "Telenex.".
199416
19 201315
20 200213

About David Coniam

David Coniam is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (32 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (19 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (18 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (10 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Educational Technology and Assessment (10 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers) and Speech and dialogue systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (471 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (385 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (326 citations), Communication (144 citations) and Health Informatics (25 citations). David Coniam has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Greece and China. Frequent co-authors include Barley Mak, Icy Lee, Luke K. Fryer, Zi Yan, Zhao Wen, Yangyu Xiao, Christopher G. Dowson, Peter Bodycott, Allan Walker and Tong Lee. Their work appears in journals such as System, BioTechniques, Language Awareness, ReCALL and CALICO Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact