Patricia E. Murphy

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Patricia E. Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health 869
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Clinical Psychology 493
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 493
  • General Health Professions 195
Replace Peter Speck with:
Peter Speck United Kingdom
Michele Galietta United States
Gowri Anandarajah United States
Sharon K. Hull United States
Ruth A. Tanyi United States
Faten Al Zaben Saudi Arabia
Andrea C. Phelps United States
Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh Iran
Karla Espinosa Monteros United States
Lars Johan Danbolt Norway
Patricia E. Murphy relative to Peter Speck United Kingdom Peter Speck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Peter Speck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patricia E. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia E. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia E. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia E. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia E. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia E. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia E. Murphy. The network helps show where Patricia E. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patricia E. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patricia E. Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Patricia E. Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007204
2 2004193
3 200995
4 200089
5 200483
6 199262
7 201651
8 200451
9 201248
10 201835
11 201534
12 201534
13 200726
14 200124
15 201321
16
Learning and Practice: Agency and Identities
200820
17 201217
18 201616
19 201916
20 200913

About Patricia E. Murphy

Patricia E. Murphy is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (24 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (7 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (869 citations), Applied Psychology (121 citations), Clinical Psychology (493 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (493 citations) and General Health Professions (195 citations). Patricia E. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George Fitchett, Andrea L. Canada, Amy H. Peterman, Leslie R. Schover, Kevin Stein, J. L. Gibbons, Jo Kim, Stephen D. King, Corinne Crammer and Kenneth M. Portier. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Cancer and Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact