Patricia E. Murphy

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Patricia E. Murphy
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Health 892
  • Clinical Psychology 352
  • Applied Psychology 72
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 265
  • Social Psychology 159
Replace Peter Speck with:
Peter Speck United Kingdom
Gowri Anandarajah United States
Sharon K. Hull United States
Ingela Thuné‐Boyle United Kingdom
Faten Al Zaben Saudi Arabia
Inez Tuck United States
Michael J. Balboni United States
Michele Galietta United States
Kristin J. August United States
Andrea C. Phelps United States
Patricia E. Murphy relative to Peter Speck United Kingdom Peter Speck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Peter Speck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patricia E. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patricia E. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patricia E. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patricia E. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patricia E. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patricia E. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patricia E. Murphy. The network helps show where Patricia E. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patricia E. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patricia E. Murphy Line = papers co-authored together Patricia E. Murphy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007212
2 2004206
3 2000129
4 200996
5 200495
6 199268
7 200765
8 201660
9 200452
10 201250
11 201547
12 201547
13 201841
14
Learning and Practice: Agency and Identities
200828
15 200125
16 201320
17 201217
18 201916
19 202016
20 201616

About Patricia E. Murphy

Patricia E. Murphy is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (20 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers) and Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (892 citations), Clinical Psychology (352 citations), Applied Psychology (72 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (265 citations) and Social Psychology (159 citations). Patricia E. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include George Fitchett, Andrea L. Canada, Amy H. Peterman, Leslie R. Schover, Kevin Stein, Jo Kim, J. L. Gibbons, Stephen D. King, Ralph L. Piedmont and Sharon E. Cheston. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology and Palliative & Supportive Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact