Peter Speck

1.9k citations
43 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Speck

40 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Speck
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Health 502
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 569
  • Clinical Psychology 359
  • Applied Psychology 51
  • General Health Professions 124
Replace Patricia E. Murphy with:
Patricia E. Murphy United States
Marguerite S. Lederberg United States
Gowri Anandarajah United States
Sharon K. Hull United States
Ruth A. Tanyi United States
Andrea C. Phelps United States
Michele Galietta United States
Michael Balboni United States
Elisabeth Assing Hvidt Denmark
Martha Meraviglia United States
Peter Speck relative to Patricia E. Murphy United States Patricia E. Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Patricia E. Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Speck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Speck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Speck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Speck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Speck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Speck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Speck. The network helps show where Peter Speck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Speck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Speck Line = papers co-authored together Peter Speck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017188
2 2011109
3 201192
4 199986
5 201177
6 199468
7 200868
8 201260
9 201358
10 201238
11 200536
12 201232
13 201332
14 201428
15 201128
16
Being There: Pastoral Care in Time of Illness
198824
17 201623
18 201223
19 201221
20 201217

About Peter Speck

Peter Speck is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (8 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers) and Restless Legs Syndrome Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (502 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (569 citations), Clinical Psychology (359 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations) and General Health Professions (124 citations). Peter Speck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Irene J Higginson, Sue Hall, Cassie Goddard, Lucy Selman, Marjolein Gysels, Pauline Martin, Michael King, Richard Harding, Michael C. King and Jonathan Koffman. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative Medicine, Social Science & Medicine, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact