Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy

335 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy usually cover Health (260 papers), Clinical Psychology (143 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (132 papers) specifically the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (260 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (105 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy are Kelley A. Raab, Daniel H. Grossoehme, George Fitchett, Kevin J. Flannelly, George Handzo, Katherine R. B. Jankowski, Laura T. Flannelly, Wendy Cadge, Lindsay B. Carey and Kathleen Galek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025