Cancer Cytopathology

1.3k papers and 24.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Cancer Cytopathology in the last decades have received a total of 24.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cancer Cytopathology usually cover Surgery (529 papers), Oncology (479 papers) and Epidemiology (338 papers) specifically the topics of Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (219 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (206 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cancer Cytopathology are Andrew A. Renshaw, William C. Faquin, Ritu Nayar, Martha B. Pitman, Christopher J. VandenBussche, Edmund S. Cibas, Paul A. VanderLaan, Jeffrey F. Krane, Esther Diana Rossi and Syed Z. Ali.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cancer Cytopathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cancer Cytopathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cancer Cytopathology.

Countries where authors publish in Cancer Cytopathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cancer Cytopathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cancer Cytopathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer Cytopathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025