Stephen D. King

17 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Stephen D. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Health 206
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 151
  • Applied Psychology 19
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 9
Replace Anke I. Liefbroer with:
Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands
Steve Nolan United Kingdom
Anne Vandenhoeck Belgium
Kenneth Texeira United States
Dorte Toudal Viftrup Denmark
Susan Downing Videen United States
Elizabeth Grant Australia
Stef Van den Branden Belgium
Jinsun Yong South Korea
Jo Kim United States
Stephen D. King relative to Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands Anke I. Liefbroer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Anke I. Liefbroer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. King. The network helps show where Stephen D. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. King Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201651
2 201847
3 201534
4 201229
5 201321
6 201614
7 201213
8 201712
9 201712
10
Grave New World: The End of Globalization, the Return of History
201711
11 20209
12 20055
13 20064
14
Trust the Process: A History of Clinical Pastoral Education as Theological Education
20074
15 20251
16 20001
17 20171
18 20230
19 20220

About Stephen D. King

Stephen D. King is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 19 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (9 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (2 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (206 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (151 citations), Applied Psychology (19 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (9 citations). Stephen D. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George Fitchett, Patricia E. Murphy, Betty Ferrell, Christina M. Puchalski, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Elizabeth T. Loggers, David A. Harrison, Donna L. Berry, Rebecca H. Johnson and Shelby L. Langer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology and Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact