Stephen D. King

19 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Stephen D. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Health 225
  • Clinical Psychology 102
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
  • Applied Psychology 13
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace Anke I. Liefbroer with:
Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands
Steve Nolan United Kingdom
Anne Vandenhoeck Belgium
Kenneth Texeira United States
Susan Downing Videen United States
Vibeke Østergaard Steenfeldt Denmark
Dorte Toudal Viftrup Denmark
Christina Prinds Denmark
Fatma Öz Türkiye
Pamela H. Cone United States
Stephen D. King relative to Anke I. Liefbroer Netherlands Anke I. Liefbroer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Anke I. Liefbroer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. King. The network helps show where Stephen D. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen D. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen D. King Line = papers co-authored together Stephen D. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201660
2 201849
3 201547
4 201231
5 201625
6 201320
7 201715
8 201213
9
Grave New World: The End of Globalization, the Return of History
201713
10 201712
11 20209
12 20055
13
Trust the Process: A History of Clinical Pastoral Education as Theological Education
20075
14 20064
15 20252
16 20102
17 20171
18 20001
19 20151
20 20230

About Stephen D. King

Stephen D. King is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (12 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (2 papers) and Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (225 citations), Clinical Psychology (102 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations), Applied Psychology (13 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). Stephen D. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include George Fitchett, Patricia E. Murphy, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Elizabeth T. Loggers, David A. Harrison, Betty Ferrell, Christina M. Puchalski, Donna L. Berry, Rebecca H. Johnson and Paul J. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Supportive Care in Cancer and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact