Nerilee Hing

271 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Peers

Nerilee Hing
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Clinical Psychology 5.5k
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 339
  • Marketing 692
  • General Decision Sciences 127
  • Applied Psychology 354
Replace Sally Gainsbury with:
Sally Gainsbury Australia
Cornelia Pechmann United States
Cynthia Cryder United States
Dennis W. Rook United States
Joachim Vosgerau United States
Adam Duhachek United States
Joyce Hogan United States
Joeri Hofmans Belgium
Aimée Drolet United States
Mark V. Roehling United States
Nerilee Hing relative to Sally Gainsbury Australia Sally Gainsbury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Sally Gainsbury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nerilee Hing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nerilee Hing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nerilee Hing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nerilee Hing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nerilee Hing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nerilee Hing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nerilee Hing. The network helps show where Nerilee Hing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nerilee Hing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nerilee Hing Line = papers co-authored together Nerilee Hing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 281 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013170
2 1995163
3 2015154
4 2014142
5 2012135
6 2013128
7 2015119
8 2001112
9 2014101
10 201493
11 201186
12 201385
13 201482
14 201581
15 201479
16
Franchisee satisfaction: contributors and consequences
199577
17 201276
18 201571
19 201769
20 201567

About Nerilee Hing

Nerilee Hing is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Marketing, having authored 281 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (225 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (94 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (44 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (34 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (21 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (18 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers) and Digital Games and Media (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (5.5k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (339 citations), Marketing (692 citations), General Decision Sciences (127 citations) and Applied Psychology (354 citations). Nerilee Hing has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alex Russell, Sally Gainsbury, Helen Breen, Alex Blaszczynski, Matthew Browne, Peter Vitartas, Matthew Lamont, Elaine Nuske, Daniel L. King and Matthew Rockloff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Gambling Studies, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, International Gambling Studies and Addictive Behaviors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact