Journal of Behavioral Addictions

915 papers and 31.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 915 papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions in the last decades have received a total of 31.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions usually cover Clinical Psychology (576 papers), Sociology and Political Science (479 papers) and Education (214 papers) specifically the topics of Impact of Technology on Adolescents (436 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (295 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (247 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Behavioral Addictions are Mark D. Griffiths, Marc N. Potenza, Joël Billieux, Daniel L. King, Halley M. Pontes, Paul Delfabbro, Abdullah Akpınar, Kadir Demirci, Xavier Carbonell and Daria J. Kuss.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Behavioral Addictions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Behavioral Addictions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025