Nancy M. Blaker

9 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Nancy M. Blaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 97
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 61
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Marketing 36
  • Social Psychology 77
Replace Xue Zheng with:
Xue Zheng China
Inmaculada Adarves‐Yorno United Kingdom
Lynne C. Vincent United States
Emil G. Moldovan United States
Beth A. Pontari United States
Channah Herschberg Netherlands
Rachel Lise Ruttan United States
John Rijsman Netherlands
Tina Urbach Germany
Ike Silver United States
Nancy M. Blaker relative to Xue Zheng China Xue Zheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Xue Zheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy M. Blaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy M. Blaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy M. Blaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy M. Blaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy M. Blaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy M. Blaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy M. Blaker. The network helps show where Nancy M. Blaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nancy M. Blaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy M. Blaker Line = papers co-authored together Nancy M. Blaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013105
2 201243
3 202030
4 202028
5 201420
6 201816
7 20179
8 20198
9 20203

About Nancy M. Blaker

Nancy M. Blaker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 9 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (97 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (61 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Marketing (36 citations) and Social Psychology (77 citations). Nancy M. Blaker has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark van Vugt, Fiona Edgar, Channah Herschberg, Jing A. Zhang, Astrid C. Homan, Catrin Finkenauer, Gerben A. van Kleef, Marc W. Heerdink, André M. Everett and Brian R. Spisak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personnel Review, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Psychological Science and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact