Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

48.4k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1998

Impact in

Papers in

    • Social and Intergroup Psychology 1.1k
    • Social Power and Status Dynamics 43
    • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research 36
    • Conflict Management and Negotiation 27
    • Misinformation and Its Impacts 20
    • Team Dynamics and Performance 97
    • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 41

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

1.4k papers receiving 45.2k citations

Peers

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
Comparison fields: 5 of 186
  • Sociology and Political Science 30.1k
  • Social Psychology 8.2k
  • Gender Studies 3k
  • Communication 1.7k
  • General Decision Sciences 527
Replace Social Psychological and Personality Science with:
Social Psychological and Personality Science United States
Basic and Applied Social Psychology United States
Social and Personality Psychology Compass United States
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking United States
Current Opinion in Psychology United States
Social Science Information France
British Journal of Social Psychology United Kingdom
Social Psychology Quarterly United States
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour United States
Communication Monographs United States
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations relative to Social Psychological and Personality Science United States Social Psychological and Personality Science's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Social Psychological and Personality Science · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Group Processes & Intergroup Relations more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

About Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

The 1.4k papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations in the last decades have received a total of 48.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Social Psychology (201 papers), General Decision Sciences (14 papers), Safety Research (58 papers) and Gender Studies (38 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (1.1k papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (97 papers), Social Power and Status Dynamics (43 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (42 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (41 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (36 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (27 papers) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations are Miles Hewstone, Richard John Crisp, John F. Dovidio, Maykel Verkuyten, Linda R. Tropp, William Dominic Joshua Abrams, Alberto Voci, Gordon Hodson, Karen M. Douglas and Kipling D. Williams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact