Mike Denis
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management 2
-
- Medication Adherence and Compliance 2
- Co-authors
- Felicity Callard (3 shared papers)Simon Lovestone (4 shared papers)Robert Stewart (3 shared papers)Matthew Broadbent (3 shared papers)Matthew Hotopf (2 shared papers)Graham Thornicroft (1 shared paper)Gayan Perera (1 shared paper)Til Wykes (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Psychiatry (3 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Journal of Mental Health (1 paper)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)Heart (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Mike Denis
12 papers receiving 673 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Applied Psychology 78
- Psychiatry and Mental health 154
- Medical Terminology 2
- Health Information Management 28
- Clinical Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Mike Denis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Denis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Denis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Denis. The network helps show where Mike Denis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mike Denis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 355 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 2 |
About Mike Denis
Mike Denis is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Family Practice, General Health Professions, Health Information Management and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 681 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (78 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (154 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Health Information Management (28 citations) and Clinical Psychology (87 citations). Mike Denis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Felicity Callard, Simon Lovestone, Robert Stewart, Matthew Broadbent, Matthew Hotopf, Graham Thornicroft, Gayan Perera, Til Wykes, Liam Ennis and Diana Rose. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Mental Health, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Heart.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.