Liam Ennis

1.1k citations
29 papers · 723 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 12
    • Child Abuse and Trauma 5
    • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 4
    • Crime Patterns and Interventions 7
    • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 7
    • Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 4

Liam Ennis

28 papers receiving 676 citations

Peers

Liam Ennis
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Applied Psychology 93
  • Clinical Psychology 338
  • General Health Professions 274
  • Health 73
Replace Jo River with:
Jo River Australia
Kisha B. Holden United States
Xanthe Hunt South Africa
Antônia Regina Ferreira Furegato Brazil
John Mendoza Australia
Peter Huggard New Zealand
Jennifer Cerully United States
John Goodwin Ireland
Ginette G. Ferszt United States
Allie Slemon Canada
Liam Ennis relative to Jo River Australia Jo River's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×49×
Jo River · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Ennis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Ennis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Ennis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Ennis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Ennis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Ennis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Ennis. The network helps show where Liam Ennis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Ennis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Ennis Line = papers co-authored together Liam Ennis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013196
2 201296
3 200350
4 200350
5 200441
6 200439
7 201434
8 201130
9 201230
10 201529
11 201318
12 201717
13 201413
14 20209
15 20159
16 20158
17 19958
18 20176
19 20156
20 20096

About Liam Ennis

Liam Ennis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Health and Gender Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (5 citations), Applied Psychology (93 citations), Clinical Psychology (338 citations), General Health Professions (274 citations) and Health (73 citations). Liam Ennis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Til Wykes, Diana Rose, Mike Denis, Sandy Jung, L. Alvin Malesky, William D. Murphy, Michael C. Seto, Felicity Callard, Dan Robotham and Karen Buro. Their work appears in journals such as Sexual Abuse, BMC Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology and Journal of Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact