Federica Mathis

22 papers receiving 539 citations

Peers

Federica Mathis
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Literature and Literary Theory 52
  • Epidemiology 125
  • Clinical Psychology 79
  • Physiology 96
Replace Eileen Goddard with:
Eileen Goddard United Kingdom
Zipora Barnea Israel
Theodore V. Cooper United States
Arielle S. Gillman United States
Jordan Skalisky United States
Darrian Evans United States
Erika Litvin Bloom United States
Candice D. Donaldson United States
Sabrina Voci Canada
Leigh Gemmell United States
Federica Mathis relative to Eileen Goddard United Kingdom Eileen Goddard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Eileen Goddard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Mathis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Mathis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Mathis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Mathis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Mathis. The network helps show where Federica Mathis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federica Mathis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federica Mathis Line = papers co-authored together Federica Mathis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201286
2 201367
3 201462
4 201153
5 200543
6 201638
7 201432
8 200624
9 201421
10 201119
11 201618
12 201118
13 201916
14 201214
15 201514
16
Psychopathological symptoms in detoxified and non-detoxified heroindependent patients entering residential treatment
201512
17 201612
18 20204
19 20204
20
Deaths attributable to tobacco smoking in Italy
20082

About Federica Mathis

Federica Mathis is a scholar working on Physiology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Pharmacology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (52 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Epidemiology (125 citations), Clinical Psychology (79 citations) and Physiology (96 citations). Federica Mathis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio Faggiano, Matthis Morgenstern, Helen Sweeting, Reiner Hanewinkel, James D. Sargent, Ewa Florek, Kate Hunt, Ron H. J. Scholte, Rutger C. M. E. Engels and Stefán Hrafn Jónsson. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, PEDIATRICS, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Thorax and International Journal of Drug Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact