Federica Mathis

23 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

Federica Mathis
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Applied Psychology 57
  • Literature and Literary Theory 56
  • Epidemiology 131
  • Clinical Psychology 86
  • Physiology 100
Replace Eileen Goddard with:
Eileen Goddard United Kingdom
Zipora Barnea Israel
Theodore V. Cooper United States
Nancy A. Piotrowski United States
Arielle S. Gillman United States
Candice D. Donaldson United States
Jordan Skalisky United States
Darrian Evans United States
Erika Litvin Bloom United States
Suzanne D. Sales United States
Federica Mathis relative to Eileen Goddard United Kingdom Eileen Goddard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Eileen Goddard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Mathis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Mathis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Mathis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Mathis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Mathis. The network helps show where Federica Mathis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federica Mathis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federica Mathis Line = papers co-authored together Federica Mathis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 201369
3 201465
4 201154
5 200547
6 201639
7 201432
8 200625
9 201424
10 201121
11 201621
12 201119
13 201517
14 201916
15 201615
16 201214
17
Psychopathological symptoms in detoxified and non-detoxified heroindependent patients entering residential treatment
201512
18 20204
19 20204
20
Deaths attributable to tobacco smoking in Italy
20082

About Federica Mathis

Federica Mathis is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 23 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (57 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (56 citations), Epidemiology (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (86 citations) and Physiology (100 citations). Federica Mathis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio Faggiano, Reiner Hanewinkel, Helen Sweeting, James D. Sargent, Matthis Morgenstern, Ron H. J. Scholte, Kate Hunt, Ewa Florek, Federica Vigna‐Taglianti and Rutger C. M. E. Engels. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Substance Use & Misuse, Drug and Alcohol Review, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Comprehensive Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact