Melissa Bishop

556 citations
15 papers · 432 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Melissa Bishop

14 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Melissa Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Marketing 286
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 27
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 109
  • Information Systems and Management 29
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Ying‐Ching Lin with:
Ying‐Ching Lin Taiwan
Andrea Webb Luangrath United States
Soyoung Kim South Korea
Chin-Hsun Tsai United States
Manfred Berger Germany
Femke van Horen Netherlands
Iman Naderi United States
Christiane Klarmann Germany
Emmanouela E. Manganari Greece
Lisa Watson Canada
Melissa Bishop relative to Ying‐Ching Lin Taiwan Ying‐Ching Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Ying‐Ching Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Bishop. The network helps show where Melissa Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Melissa Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melissa Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Melissa Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2012174
2 201490
3 201033
4 201528
5 201527
6 201919
7 201216
8 201116
9 201314
10 20156
11 20223
12 20152
13 20172
14 20031
15 20241

About Melissa Bishop

Melissa Bishop is a scholar working on Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Sustainability in Business (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (1 paper) and Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (286 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (27 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (109 citations), Information Systems and Management (29 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Melissa Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Nelson Barber, Raymond J. Goodman, Pei‐Jou Kuo, Mark Peterson, Thomas Gruen, Lindsey M. Matt, Karin G. Coifman, K. Maria Nylocks, Michael J. Kane and E. Deanne Brocato. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Marketing, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Memory, Emotion and Journal of Product & Brand Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact