Melanie Simms

53 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers

Melanie Simms
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Public Administration 873
  • General Health Professions 586
  • Political Science and International Relations 486
  • Sociology and Political Science 309
  • Urban Studies 34
Replace Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick with:
Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick United Kingdom
Berndt Karl Keller Germany
Maite Tapia United States
Christian Lyhne Ibsen Denmark
Thorsten Schulten Germany
Janice Fine United States
Stephanie Tailby United Kingdom
Kurt Vandaele Belgium
Steffen Lehndorff Germany
Mark R. Freedland United Kingdom
Melanie Simms relative to Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick United Kingdom Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Simms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Simms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Simms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Simms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Simms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Simms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Simms. The network helps show where Melanie Simms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Simms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Simms Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Simms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004106
2 201096
3 200087
4 201860
5 200057
6 200050
7 201941
8 200739
9 201439
10
Union Voices: Tactics and Tensions in UK Organizing
201238
11 200737
12 201235
13 201827
14 201824
15 201523
16
Trade unions: power and influence in a changed context
201021
17 201221
18 201720
19 200719
20 200918

About Melanie Simms

Melanie Simms is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Finance, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (43 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (24 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (4 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers) and Canadian Identity and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (873 citations), General Health Professions (586 citations), Political Science and International Relations (486 citations), Sociology and Political Science (309 citations) and Urban Studies (34 citations). Melanie Simms has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Edmund Heery, Jane Holgate, Jane Wills, Rick Delbridge, John F. Salmon, Maite Tapia, Deborah Dean, Guglielmo Meardi, Andy Charlwood and John L. Salmon. Their work appears in journals such as Economic and Industrial Democracy, Employee Relations, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Work and Occupations and Capital & Class.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact