Jane Holgate

46 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jane Holgate
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Public Administration 758
  • General Health Professions 544
  • Political Science and International Relations 372
  • Gender Studies 129
  • Sociology and Political Science 510
Replace R. M. Blackburn with:
R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom
Hugh Collins United Kingdom
Ray Markey Australia
William J. Carrington United States
Deborah A. Mitchell United States
Ken Prandy United Kingdom
George Gonos United States
James R. Barrett United States
Christian Lahusen Germany
Barbara Taylor United Kingdom
Jane Holgate relative to R. M. Blackburn United Kingdom R. M. Blackburn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
R. M. Blackburn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Holgate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Holgate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Holgate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Holgate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Holgate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Holgate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Holgate. The network helps show where Jane Holgate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Holgate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Holgate Line = papers co-authored together Jane Holgate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005145
2 2014143
3 2013128
4 1960118
5 201096
6 201860
7 201359
8 195956
9 200954
10 200644
11
Union Voices: Tactics and Tensions in UK Organizing
201238
12 201433
13 201828
14 201823
15 201222
16 200822
17 201221
18 201220
19 201118
20 195517

About Jane Holgate

Jane Holgate is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (33 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (18 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (16 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (1 paper) and Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (758 citations), General Health Professions (544 citations), Political Science and International Relations (372 citations), Gender Studies (129 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (510 citations). Jane Holgate has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Melanie Simms, Maite Tapia, Gail Hebson, Anne E. McBride, Gabriella Alberti, M Schachter, HARRY O. J. COLLIER, Edmund Heery, John A.H. Sharp and Anna Pollert. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Economic and Industrial Democracy, Nature, Capital & Class and The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact