Janice Fine

1.2k citations
47 papers · 729 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Janice Fine

38 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Janice Fine
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Public Administration 475
  • General Health Professions 339
  • Political Science and International Relations 236
  • Strategy and Management 126
  • Sociology and Political Science 348
Replace Stephanie Tailby with:
Stephanie Tailby United Kingdom
Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick United Kingdom
Maite Tapia United States
Kirsty Newsome United Kingdom
Bruce Nissen United States
Andrew O'Reilly United Kingdom
Bjarke Refslund Denmark
Tom Juravich United States
Antonio Martín Artiles Spain
Melanie Simms United Kingdom
Janice Fine relative to Stephanie Tailby United Kingdom Stephanie Tailby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Stephanie Tailby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Fine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Fine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Fine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Fine. The network helps show where Janice Fine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janice Fine Line = papers co-authored together Janice Fine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005137
2 201088
3 200769
4 201748
5 201240
6 201840
7 201633
8 200930
9 200025
10 201524
11 201024
12 200820
13 201719
14 201315
15 200013
16 202312
17 201711
18 20149
19 20118
20 20178

About Janice Fine

Janice Fine is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 47 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (31 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (14 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (10 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (9 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (8 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (4 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (3 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (475 citations), General Health Professions (339 citations), Political Science and International Relations (236 citations), Strategy and Management (126 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (348 citations). Janice Fine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Bolivia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Tichenor, Tim Bartley, Matthew Amengual, Victor Narro, Brian Burgoon, Wade Jacoby, Roger Waldinger, Ruth Milkman, Natasha Iskander and Hana Shepherd. Their work appears in journals such as Politics & Society, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Relations industrielles, Work and Occupations and Perspectives on Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact