McDowell Porter

453 citations
15 papers · 289 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

McDowell Porter

13 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

McDowell Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Marketing 137
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 57
  • Sociology and Political Science 148
  • Information Systems and Management 22
  • Human-Computer Interaction 16
Replace Justine M. Rapp with:
Justine M. Rapp United States
Mehpare Tokay Argan Türkiye
Isha Sharma India
Po‐Lin Pan United States
Claire I. Tsai Canada
Kartik Pashupati United States
Kenneth Henderson United States
Wentong Liu United Kingdom
Kate Barasz United States
McDowell Porter relative to Justine M. Rapp United States Justine M. Rapp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Justine M. Rapp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by McDowell Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of McDowell Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by McDowell Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites McDowell Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by McDowell Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by McDowell Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by McDowell Porter. The network helps show where McDowell Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside McDowell Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with McDowell Porter Line = papers co-authored together McDowell Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 202161
2 201655
3
Making competition in health care work.
199452
4 202148
5 201930
6 201515
7 20229
8 20206
9 20205
10 20223
11 20223
12 20231
13 20241
14 20250
15 20250

About McDowell Porter

McDowell Porter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (5 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (137 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (57 citations), Sociology and Political Science (148 citations), Information Systems and Management (22 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations). McDowell Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Elyria Kemp, Judith Anne Garretson Folse, George Bosworth Brown, Elizabeth Teisberg, My Bui, Nwamaka A. Anaza, Kristy E. Reynolds, Dan Hamilton Rice, Kim Williams and Kyeong Sam Min. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Marketing, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, International Journal of Advertising and Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact