Mark Pomplun

28 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Mark Pomplun
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Management Science and Operations Research 87
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
  • Education 157
  • Safety Research 36
  • Statistics and Probability 34
Replace Cara Cahalan with:
Cara Cahalan United States
Anne Corinne Huggins United States
Michal Beller Israel
Kyndra Middleton United States
Youn‐Jeng Choi United States
Gloria S. Dion United States
S. Alan Cohen United States
Burak Aydın Türkiye
Nancy Nesbitt Vacc United States
Anne Deiglmayr Germany
Mark Pomplun relative to Cara Cahalan United States Cara Cahalan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Cara Cahalan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Pomplun

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Pomplun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Pomplun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Pomplun more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Pomplun

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Pomplun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Pomplun. The network helps show where Mark Pomplun may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Pomplun, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Pomplun Line = papers co-authored together Mark Pomplun links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200247
2 199623
3 199721
4 200619
5 200518
6 200518
7 199717
8
SB5: Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition
202015
9 200015
10 199814
11 198812
12 200411
13 199711
14 199210
15 199910
16
Dyslexia Linked to Visual Strengths Useful in Astronomy
20118
17 19998
18 20067
19 20046
20 20016

About Mark Pomplun

Mark Pomplun is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 31 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (13 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (5 papers), Disability Education and Employment (4 papers), School Choice and Performance (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (4 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (87 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (88 citations), Education (157 citations), Safety Research (36 citations) and Statistics and Probability (34 citations). Mark Pomplun has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy D. Ritchie, Gale H. Roid, Napoleon Oleka, David Wright, M. H. Schneps, James R. Brockmole, L. J. Greenhill and Gerhard Sonnert. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Measurement in Education, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Applied Psychology, Educational Assessment and Journal of Educational Computing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact