Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

214.5k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
    • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Papers in

Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

1.3k papers receiving 204.7k citations

Peers

Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
Comparison fields: 5 of 242
  • Applied Psychology 15.2k
  • Social Psychology 54.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 50.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 30.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 21.5k
Replace Psychological Methods with:
Psychological Methods United States
Multivariate Behavioral Research United States
Annual Review of Psychology United States
Current Directions in Psychological Science United States
Perspectives on Psychological Science United States
Sociological Methods & Research United States
Applied Psychological Measurement United States
Review of General Psychology United States
Psychological Inquiry United States
Annual Review of Sociology United States
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal relative to Psychological Methods United States Psychological Methods's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Psychological Methods · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal.

About Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal

The 1.4k papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal in the last decades have received a total of 214.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal usually cover Statistics and Probability (662 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (688 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (258 papers), Applied Psychology (94 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (341 papers) specifically the topics of Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (585 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (394 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (339 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (203 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (161 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (155 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (155 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal are Peter M. Bentler, Li‐tze Hu, Fangfang Chen, Bengt Muthén, Tihomir Asparouhov, Gordon W. Cheung, Roger B. Rensvold, Deborah L Bandalos, Herbert W. Marsh and Craig K. Enders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact