Mark Philo

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Mark Philo
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Biochemistry 134
  • Food Science 318
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 156
  • Analytical Chemistry 105
  • Pollution 105
Replace Merve Bacanlı with:
Merve Bacanlı Türkiye
Ramtej J. Verma India
William J. Driskell United States
Prasanna D. Belur India
Rainer Gürtler Germany
Solomon E. Owumi Nigeria
Rita de Cássia Avellaneda Guimarães Brazil
Amel Nakbi Tunisia
Salvatore Ciappellano Italy
Carolien Versantvoort Netherlands
Mark Philo relative to Merve Bacanlı Türkiye Merve Bacanlı's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Merve Bacanlı · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Philo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Philo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Philo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Philo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Philo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Philo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Philo. The network helps show where Mark Philo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Philo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Philo Line = papers co-authored together Mark Philo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002178
2 2009154
3 201498
4 200294
5 201574
6 201768
7 202066
8 200352
9 200845
10 201342
11 201635
12 199435
13 201831
14 202028
15 199728
16 202024
17 202023
18 201123
19 201822
20 200921

About Mark Philo

Mark Philo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Biochemistry and Pollution, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (5 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (134 citations), Food Science (318 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (156 citations), Analytical Chemistry (105 citations) and Pollution (105 citations). Mark Philo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Laurence Castle, Cristina Nerı́n, Andrew D. Watson, Don Clarke, Antony S. Lloyd, D.R. Speck, Jongsung Ahn, E. Kate Kemsley, Paul A. Kroon and Yvonne Gunning. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Food Additives & Contaminants, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Food Chemistry and Journal of High Resolution Chromatography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact