David Baker

51 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

David Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Health 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 116
  • Sociology and Political Science 151
  • Public Administration 9
  • Clinical Psychology 49
Replace Dennis Jay Kenney with:
Dennis Jay Kenney United States
Hyunin Baek United States
Joan E. Jacoby United States
Sarah Charman United Kingdom
Tom Ellis United Kingdom
Helen Taylor Greene United States
Albert J. Meehan United States
Michael A. Caldero United States
Mark L. Dantzker United States
Lesley Noaks United Kingdom
David Baker relative to Dennis Jay Kenney United States Dennis Jay Kenney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Dennis Jay Kenney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Baker. The network helps show where David Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Baker Line = papers co-authored together David Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201231
2 201614
3 200813
4 201313
5 200812
6 201011
7 200911
8 201610
9 201810
10 200810
11 20199
12 20199
13
How different, how similar? : comparing key organizational qualities of American public and private secondary schools
19969
14 20198
15 20178
16 20078
17 20117
18 20137
19 20047
20 20167

About David Baker

David Baker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 60 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (10 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (7 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (38 citations), Political Science and International Relations (116 citations), Sociology and Political Science (151 citations), Public Administration (9 citations) and Clinical Psychology (49 citations). David Baker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Philip Stenning, Otto Adang, Richard Denniss, Christopher Birkbeck, Thomas Feltes, Simon Bronitt, P. A. J. Waddington, Hakki Eres, Stephen P. Broughman and Mei Han. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, Police Practice and Research, Crime Law and Social Change, Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact