Mark Barrow

52 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Mark Barrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Family Practice 86
  • Research and Theory 31
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 383
  • General Health Professions 268
  • Education 305
Replace Susan van Schalkwyk with:
Susan van Schalkwyk South Africa
Matilda Liljedahl Sweden
Lesley Pugsley United Kingdom
Francisco Manuel Olmos‐Vega Colombia
Scheltus J. van Luijk Netherlands
Jill Yielder New Zealand
Diane Kelly United Kingdom
Mona Faisal Al-Qahtani Saudi Arabia
Shwu‐Ru Liou Taiwan
Morag Gray United Kingdom
Mark Barrow relative to Susan van Schalkwyk South Africa Susan van Schalkwyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Susan van Schalkwyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Barrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Barrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Barrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Barrow. The network helps show where Mark Barrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Barrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Barrow Line = papers co-authored together Mark Barrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009164
2 2011109
3 199953
4 201041
5 201432
6 201431
7 200930
8 201230
9 200629
10 200929
11 201124
12 202023
13 200919
14 199818
15
Interprofessional learning in medical education in New Zealand.
201018
16 201716
17 201816
18 201415
19 202112
20 201012

About Mark Barrow

Mark Barrow is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 54 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (7 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (6 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (86 citations), Research and Theory (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (383 citations), General Health Professions (268 citations) and Education (305 citations). Mark Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include John Hattie, Tzu‐Chieh Yu, Judy McKimm, Andrew Hill, Jennifer Weller, Barbara Grant, Linlin Xu, Phillippa Poole, Deborah Rowe and Elana Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education Research & Development, Higher Education, Medical Education, The International Journal for Academic Development and Quality in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact