Mark Barrow

54 papers receiving 892 citations

Peers

Mark Barrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Family Practice 41
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 280
  • Education 301
  • General Health Professions 209
Replace Susan van Schalkwyk with:
Susan van Schalkwyk South Africa
Lesley Pugsley United Kingdom
Matilda Liljedahl Sweden
Sherril B. Gelmon United States
C J Bland United States
Jessica Mesman Netherlands
Sarah Wright Canada
Roger Ellis United Kingdom
Hywel Thomas United Kingdom
Wendy Smyth Australia
Mark Barrow relative to Susan van Schalkwyk South Africa Susan van Schalkwyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Susan van Schalkwyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Barrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Barrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Barrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Barrow. The network helps show where Mark Barrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Barrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Barrow Line = papers co-authored together Mark Barrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009165
2 2011112
3 199962
4 201042
5 201433
6 200933
7 201433
8 200631
9 201230
10 200930
11 202026
12 201125
13 200921
14 199820
15 201520
16
Interprofessional learning in medical education in New Zealand.
201019
17 201718
18 201417
19 201817
20 200913

About Mark Barrow

Mark Barrow is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 56 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (7 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (5 papers) and Nursing education and management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (20 citations), Family Practice (41 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (280 citations), Education (301 citations) and General Health Professions (209 citations). Mark Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Hattie, Tzu‐Chieh Yu, Judy McKimm, Andrew Hill, Barbara Grant, Jennifer Weller, Linlin Xu, Phillippa Poole, Anne O’Callaghan and Elana Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education, Higher Education Research & Development, Medical Education, Quality in Higher Education and The International Journal for Academic Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact