Morag Gray

1.7k citations
45 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Morag Gray

43 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Morag Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Research and Theory 238
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 28
  • Family Practice 40
  • Leadership and Management 24
  • Education 530
Replace Diane M. Billings with:
Diane M. Billings United States
Sue Atkins United Kingdom
Mary‐Anne Andrusyszyn Canada
Teresa Shellenbarger United States
Håkan Hult Sweden
Patrick A Crookes Australia
Di Marks‐Maran United Kingdom
Lynda Atack Canada
Shwu‐Ru Liou Taiwan
Judy E. Boychuk Duchscher Canada
Morag Gray relative to Diane M. Billings United States Diane M. Billings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Diane M. Billings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Morag Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morag Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morag Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morag Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Morag Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morag Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morag Gray. The network helps show where Morag Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Morag Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Morag Gray Line = papers co-authored together Morag Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003386
2 2000208
3 1999107
4 200474
5 200361
6 201254
7 201849
8 200447
9 200840
10 200232
11 201425
12
Leadership in compassionate care programme: final report.
201222
13 199922
14 201820
15 201616
16
Evaluation of Nurse Education Partnership
200416
17 200111
18 199810
19 201610
20
From an Online Cohort towards a Community of Inquiry: International Students' Interaction Patterns in an Online Doctorate Program.
20169

About Morag Gray

Morag Gray is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Research and Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (238 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations), Family Practice (40 citations), Leadership and Management (24 citations) and Education (530 citations). Morag Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine N. Smith, Ruth Endacott, Melanie Jasper, Christine Webb, Mirjam McMullan, Julie Scholes, Carolyn Miller, Jayne Donaldson, Iddo Oberski and Dorothy Horsburgh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Researcher, Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today and Pedagogy Culture and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact