Lori A. Muse

14 papers receiving 711 citations

Peers

Lori A. Muse
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 502
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 147
  • Accounting 177
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 23
  • Social Psychology 155
Replace Christopher H. Thomas with:
Christopher H. Thomas United States
Imanol Belausteguigoitia Mexico
Azize Ergeneli Türkiye
Julie Irene Hancock United States
Daniel E. Lockhart United States
Irene Nikandrou Greece
Michael Muchiri Australia
Charissa Freese Netherlands
Margaret Heffernan Ireland
Lori A. Muse relative to Christopher H. Thomas United States Christopher H. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Christopher H. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lori A. Muse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lori A. Muse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori A. Muse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori A. Muse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lori A. Muse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori A. Muse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori A. Muse. The network helps show where Lori A. Muse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Lori A. Muse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lori A. Muse Line = papers co-authored together Lori A. Muse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2008148
2 2003117
3 200899
4
Perceived organizational support: Evidence for a mediated association with work performance
200786
5 200679
6 201159
7 200547
8 200945
9 201240
10 202123
11 200822
12 20117
13
The implications of work-life benefits for employee work-family conflict and job attitudes and behaviors.
20026
14 19991

About Lori A. Muse

Lori A. Muse is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (7 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (502 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (147 citations), Accounting (177 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (23 citations) and Social Psychology (155 citations). Lori A. Muse has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stanley G. Harris, Hubert S. Feild, Sharon L. Oswald, Matthew W. Rutherford, Christina L. Stamper, William F. Giles, Shaun Pichler, Lori L. Wadsworth, Jennie E. Raymond and K. C. O’Shaughnessy. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Journal of managerial issues, Human Performance, Journal of Small Business Management and Community Work & Family.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact