K.W. Chapman
Impact in
- Food Science top 5%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
- Food Science 11
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 9
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis 2
-
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 7
- Co-authors
- Kathryn J. Boor (5 shared papers)Harry T. Lawless (6 shared papers)Joe M. Regenstein (2 shared papers)D.K. Bandler (1 shared paper)Keum Taek Hwang (1 shared paper)Armand V. Cardello (2 shared papers)Olga I. Padilla‐Zakour (1 shared paper)Gregory M. Peck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Sensory Studies (5 papers)Journal of Food Science (3 papers)Journal of Dairy Science (3 papers)HortScience (1 paper)Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
K.W. Chapman
13 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Food Science 266
- Animal Science and Zoology 136
- Nutrition and Dietetics 140
- Sensory Systems 34
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 9
Countries citing papers authored by K.W. Chapman
This map shows the geographic impact of K.W. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K.W. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K.W. Chapman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K.W. Chapman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K.W. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K.W. Chapman. The network helps show where K.W. Chapman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside K.W. Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 9 |
About K.W. Chapman
K.W. Chapman is a scholar working on Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (9 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (7 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (2 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (2 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (2 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (266 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (136 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (140 citations), Sensory Systems (34 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (9 citations). K.W. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn J. Boor, Harry T. Lawless, Joe M. Regenstein, D.K. Bandler, Keum Taek Hwang, Armand V. Cardello, Olga I. Padilla‐Zakour, Gregory M. Peck, Ian A. Merwin and Christopher B. Watkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sensory Studies, Journal of Food Science, Journal of Dairy Science, HortScience and Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.