Keith Moore

37 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Keith Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Rehabilitation 328
  • Occupational Therapy 109
  • Internal Medicine 31
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 119
  • Biomaterials 87
Replace Randall Haught with:
Randall Haught United States
Marcia Nusgart United States
K. Moore United Kingdom
Alessio Rossi Italy
Oliver Kloeters Germany
Henrik Sönnergren Sweden
Caroline Pang United Kingdom
Jamie L. Burgess United States
Hiromasa Tanno Japan
Mara Cañedo-Ayala Canada
Keith Moore relative to Randall Haught United States Randall Haught's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.5×
Randall Haught · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Moore. The network helps show where Keith Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith Moore Line = papers co-authored together Keith Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005142
2 200684
3 199983
4
Using PHMB antimicrobial to prevent wound infection
200757
5 197749
6 201047
7 196846
8 201743
9 200337
10 200735
11 200734
12 196726
13 200320
14 200318
15
A new silver dressing for wounds with delayed healing
20068
16 20046
17 20155
18 20105
19 20014
20
Embracing the Make-believe — The Making of Surfers Paradise
20053

About Keith Moore

Keith Moore is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science, Surgery, Education and Molecular Biology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 784 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (9 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (6 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Australian History and Society (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (2 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (328 citations), Occupational Therapy (109 citations), Internal Medicine (31 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (119 citations) and Biomaterials (87 citations). Keith Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Keith G Harding, Tania J. Phillips, David Gray, G.H.N. Towers, Michael Stacey, Michael G. Moore, Richard Searle, P. Sriramarao, John F. Tarlton and Allen J. Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as International Wound Journal, Journal of Educational Administration & History, Journal of Wound Care, Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease and Journal of Clinical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact