Countries where authors publish in Journal of Wound Care
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Wound Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Wound Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Wound Care more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Wound Care
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Wound Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Wound Care.
About Journal of Wound Care
The 3.4k papers published in Journal of Wound Care in the last decades have received a total of 57.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Wound Care usually cover Occupational Therapy (853 papers), Rehabilitation (1.3k papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (536 papers), Internal Medicine (96 papers) and Surgery (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (1.3k papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (852 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (532 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (498 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (246 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (185 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (99 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Wound Care are Stephen B. Thomas, Alan B. G. Lansdown, Randall D. Wolcott, KEITH F. CUTTING, Madeline Flanagan, P. C. Molan, Keith G Harding, Richard Joseph White, Scot E. Dowd and Daniel D. Rhoads.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.