Una Adderley

30 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Una Adderley
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Occupational Therapy 220
  • Internal Medicine 188
  • Rehabilitation 275
  • Surgery 426
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
Replace Michelle Gibb with:
Michelle Gibb Australia
Graham W Fuller United Kingdom
Debra Doherty United Kingdom
Eline Lima Borges Brazil
Nathan B. Parsons United States
Maria T. Szewczyk Poland
Sidnei Lastória Brazil
Ruth Bryant United States
Veronika Gerber Germany
James A. Elliott Canada
Una Adderley relative to Michelle Gibb Australia Michelle Gibb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Michelle Gibb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Una Adderley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Una Adderley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Una Adderley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Una Adderley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Una Adderley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Una Adderley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Una Adderley. The network helps show where Una Adderley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Una Adderley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Una Adderley Line = papers co-authored together Una Adderley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013148
2 201467
3 201554
4 201450
5 201547
6 201740
7 201038
8 201229
9 201421
10
Venous Leg Ulcers.
201719
11 201514
12 201612
13 201711
14 201911
15 201310
16 20198
17 20077
18 20156
19
Stockings or bandages for leg-ulcer compression?
20145
20 20145

About Una Adderley

Una Adderley is a scholar working on Surgery, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Internal Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (20 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (13 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (9 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (3 papers) and Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (220 citations), Internal Medicine (188 citations), Rehabilitation (275 citations), Surgery (426 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations). Una Adderley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Carl Thompson, Nikki Stubbs, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, Nicky Cullum, Martin Bland, Rhian Gabe, Arthur R Kang’ombe, Marta Soares and David Torgerson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Tissue Viability, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The Lancet and Journal of Wound Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact