Keith E. Stanovich

56.6k citations
290 papers · 40.8k · 15 hit papers · h-index 91

Impact in

Papers in

Keith E. Stanovich

284 papers receiving 35.7k citations

Keith E. Stanovich's Hit Papers

Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition 2013 · 2.8k citations
2.8k0+15+30Years since publication10002.0k3.0k

Peers

Keith E. Stanovich
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • General Decision Sciences 5.6k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 22.0k
  • Statistics and Probability 6.3k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 10.2k
  • Applied Psychology 1.8k
Replace Keith J. Holyoak with:
Keith J. Holyoak United States
Richard E. Nisbett United States
Robert J. Sternberg United States
Jonathan J. Evans United Kingdom
Richard F. West United States
Jean Piaget Switzerland
Philip Nicholas Johnson-Laird United States
Jerome S. Bruner United States
Anthony G. Greenwald United States
Carol Sorich Dweck United States
Keith E. Stanovich relative to Keith J. Holyoak United States Keith J. Holyoak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Keith J. Holyoak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Keith E. Stanovich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith E. Stanovich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith E. Stanovich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith E. Stanovich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith E. Stanovich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith E. Stanovich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith E. Stanovich. The network helps show where Keith E. Stanovich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Keith E. Stanovich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Keith E. Stanovich Line = papers co-authored together Keith E. Stanovich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 290 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy
Hit paper breakdown →
19863777
2
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Hit paper breakdown →
20002866
3
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition
Hit paper breakdown →
20132800
4
Toward an Interactive-Compensatory Model of Individual Differences in the Development of Reading Fluency
Hit paper breakdown →
19801225
5
Practitioner Review: Do performance‐based measures and ratings of executive function assess the same construct?
Hit paper breakdown →
20121057
6
Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model.
Hit paper breakdown →
19941014
7
Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later.
Hit paper breakdown →
1997898
8
Explaining the Differences Between the Dyslexic and the Garden-Variety Poor Reader
Hit paper breakdown →
1988886
9
Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later.
Hit paper breakdown →
1997852
10
Who Is Rational?: Studies of individual Differences in Reasoning
1999831
11
Exposure to Print and Orthographic Processing
Hit paper breakdown →
1989802
12
Who Is Rational?
Hit paper breakdown →
1999726
13
The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Hit paper breakdown →
2011720
14 1984659
15
Rationality and the Reflective Mind
Hit paper breakdown →
2010658
16 1998590
17
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
Hit paper breakdown →
2008584
18
Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test
Hit paper breakdown →
2013545
19 1997507
20
What Reading Does for the Mind.
1998414

About Keith E. Stanovich

Keith E. Stanovich is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Statistics and Probability, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 290 papers that have together received 40.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (115 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (51 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (48 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (26 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (25 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (24 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (17 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (5.6k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (22.0k citations), Statistics and Probability (6.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (10.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (1.8k citations). Keith E. Stanovich has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard F. West, Anne E. Cunningham, Maggie E. Toplak, Jonathan J. Evans, Linda S. Siegel, Dorothy J. Feeman, Alexandra Gottardo, Kathryn E. Perry, Paula J. Stanovich and Ruth G. Nathan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Journal of Learning Disabilities, Reading Research Quarterly and Memory & Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact