Behavioral and Brain Sciences

10.0k papers and 246.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.0k papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 246.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (4.1k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.3k papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Child and Animal Learning Development (1.3k papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (858 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (724 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioral and Brain Sciences are Nelson Cowan, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Jeffrey A. Gray, John R. Searle, Andy Clark, David M. Buss, David Premack, Ara Norenzayan, Joseph Henrich and Guy Woodruff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioral and Brain Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025