Jonathan Field

19 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Jonathan Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Pharmacology 232
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 81
  • Nephrology 25
Replace Aline Ramond‐Roquin with:
Aline Ramond‐Roquin France
Brenda Mullinger United Kingdom
Admin Admin Pakistan
Dino Sepúlveda Chile
Caitlin R Finley Canada
Maureen Vickers-Lahti United States
Jette Nygaard Jensen Denmark
Christelle Cristini France
Javier Bracchiglione Chile
B.-M. Bellach Germany
Jonathan Field relative to Aline Ramond‐Roquin France Aline Ramond‐Roquin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Aline Ramond‐Roquin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Field. The network helps show where Jonathan Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Field Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019107
2 201691
3 201252
4 201043
5 201426
6 201824
7 200717
8 201014
9 201613
10 20189
11 20137
12 20225
13 20135
14 20215
15
Building lives through an artistic community
20034
16 19993
17 20082
18
Returning Citizens: A quiet revolution in prisoner reintegration
20152
19 20091
20 20240

About Jonathan Field

Jonathan Field is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (13 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (232 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (81 citations) and Nephrology (25 citations). Jonathan Field has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Newell, Michelle M. Holmes, Felicity L. Bishop, George Lewith, D. F. W. Pollard, Jeffrey Lipman, Jason A. Roberts, Carl M. J. Kirkpatrick, Peter W. McCarthy and Jan T. Kielstein. Their work appears in journals such as Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, Clinical Chiropractic, Australian Critical Care, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics and Quality of Life Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact