Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

623 papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 623 papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies usually cover Pharmacology (386 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (166 papers) and Surgery (105 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (386 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (160 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies are Charlotte Leboeuf‐Yde, Bruce F. Walker, René Fejer, Simon French, Stanley Innes, Jan Hartvigsen, Alexander Ruhe, David Newell, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl and Kenneth J. Young.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies.

Countries where authors publish in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiropractic & Manual Therapies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025