Clinical Chiropractic

199 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 199 papers published in Clinical Chiropractic in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Chiropractic usually cover Pharmacology (52 papers), Surgery (46 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (34 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (52 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (29 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Chiropractic are Hugh Gemmell, Jennifer E. Bolton, David Newell, Peter Miller, J. Bagust, Martin Young, Henrik Nordström, Joyce Miller, Paul Bruno and Haymo Thiel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Chiropractic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Chiropractic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Chiropractic.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Chiropractic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Chiropractic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Chiropractic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Chiropractic more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025