B.-M. Bellach

13 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

B.-M. Bellach
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 45
  • Pharmacology 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 68
  • General Health Professions 56
  • Physiology 55
Replace S Lydeard with:
S Lydeard United Kingdom
F.G. Schellevis Netherlands
Ruchit Sood United Kingdom
K. R. Sundaram India
Colleen M. Fitzgerald United States
Vesile Şenol Türkiye
Rebekah Wang-Cheng United States
Enrique Fabian Fernandez United States
Linda M. Herrick United States
Caroline HG Bastiaenen Netherlands
B.-M. Bellach relative to S Lydeard United Kingdom S Lydeard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
S Lydeard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B.-M. Bellach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.-M. Bellach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.-M. Bellach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.-M. Bellach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.-M. Bellach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.-M. Bellach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.-M. Bellach. The network helps show where B.-M. Bellach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside B.-M. Bellach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B.-M. Bellach Line = papers co-authored together B.-M. Bellach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
[The SF-36 in the Federal Health Survey--description of a current normal sample].
1999101
2
[The Federal Health Survey: response, composition of participants and non-responder analysis].
199995
3
[The German Health Survey. 1997/98].
199889
4 200081
5 200038
6 199233
7 199531
8
Remarks on the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and other association measures in assessing validity and reliability of dietary assessment methods.
199323
9 200222
10 19965
11 20084
12 19974
13 19952

About B.-M. Bellach

B.-M. Bellach is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, Pharmacology and Health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (7 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Sports Science and Education (1 paper) and Viral Infections and Immunology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (45 citations), Pharmacology (47 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (68 citations), General Health Professions (56 citations) and Physiology (55 citations). B.-M. Bellach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Ute Ellert, W Thefeld, H. Stolzenberg, Hildtraud Knopf, L. Kohlmeier, Michael Thamm, Gerhard Arminger, Rolf Weitkunat, K. Überla and Nicole Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Annual Review of Public Health, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift and Das Gesundheitswesen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact