John Orr

790 citations
47 papers · 497 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John Orr

32 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

John Orr
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 133
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 50
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Statistics and Probability 46
  • Leadership and Management 5
Replace Charles F. Elton with:
Charles F. Elton United States
Steven D. Ashworth United States
Kenneth A. Sirotnik United States
Rebecca K. Frels United States
Robert A. Jako United States
Hyuckseung Yang United States
Kathleen R. Keeler United States
John C. Callender United States
John Kulas United States
Jack M. Wright United States
John Orr relative to Charles F. Elton United States Charles F. Elton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Charles F. Elton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Orr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Orr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Orr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Orr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Orr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Orr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Orr. The network helps show where John Orr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John Orr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Orr Line = papers co-authored together John Orr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986143
2 1991127
3 1989101
4
Cinema and Modernity
199421
5 197212
6 195411
7
Cinema and fiction : new modes of adapting, 1950-1990
199210
8
Terrorism and modern drama
19908
9 19897
10 20106
11 20005
12 19573
13 20003
14 19863
15 19773
16 19743
17 19513
18 19932
19 20082
20 20042

About John Orr

John Orr is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (8 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (6 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (5 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Samuel Beckett and Modernism (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (133 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (50 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations), Statistics and Probability (46 citations) and Leadership and Management (5 citations). John Orr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Sackett, Michael M. Harris, Cathy L. Z. DuBois, Colin Nicholson, Michael P. Mercer, Raman Selden, Bernard Weinberg and Alan Swingewood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, The Modern Language Review, British Journal of Sociology, The Sociological Review and Personnel Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact