John C. Callender

814 citations
20 papers · 657 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John C. Callender

19 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers

John C. Callender
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 130
  • General Decision Sciences 28
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 141
  • Statistics and Probability 114
  • Applied Psychology 58
Replace Mary L. Tenopyr with:
Mary L. Tenopyr United States
Vern W. Urry United Kingdom
Jerard F. Kehoe United States
Robin I. Lissak United States
Robert A. Jako United States
Michael P. Kirsch United States
John M. Orr United Kingdom
Edwin T. Cornelius United States
Steven D. Ashworth United States
John M. Rauschenberger United States
John C. Callender relative to Mary L. Tenopyr United States Mary L. Tenopyr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Mary L. Tenopyr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John C. Callender

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John C. Callender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John C. Callender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John C. Callender more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John C. Callender

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John C. Callender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John C. Callender. The network helps show where John C. Callender may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John C. Callender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John C. Callender Line = papers co-authored together John C. Callender links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1994147
2 1980100
3 198680
4 197960
5 199254
6 198144
7 198344
8 198228
9 198828
10 197726
11 199217
12 19948
13 19776
14 19825
15 19803
16 19812
17 19902
18 19821
19 19861
20 19831

About John C. Callender

John C. Callender is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Ocean Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (2 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (2 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (130 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (141 citations), Statistics and Probability (114 citations) and Applied Psychology (58 citations). John C. Callender has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H. G. Osburn, Thomas W. Dougherty, Daniel B. Turban, Ronald J. Ebert, Steven D. Ashworth and Jack M. Greener. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Personnel Psychology and Journal of Educational Measurement.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact