Personnel Psychology

2.4k papers and 194.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.4k papers published in Personnel Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 194.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Personnel Psychology usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (886 papers), Social Psychology (528 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (404 papers) specifically the topics of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (630 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (190 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Personnel Psychology are Benjamin Schneider, Amy L. Kristof‐Brown, C. H. Lawshe, Murray R. Barrick, Michael K. Mount, Timothy A. Judge, J. Kevin Ford, Robert P. Tett, Michael A. Campion and Raymond A. Noe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Personnel Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Personnel Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Personnel Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Personnel Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Personnel Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Personnel Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Personnel Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025