John E. Hunter
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Applied Psychology top 0.05%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Market Dynamics and Volatility 15
-
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 19
- Co-authors
- Frank L. Schmidt (76 shared papers)Frank L. Schmidt (26 shared papers)Stephen W. Raudenbush (1 shared paper)Gregg B. Jackson (4 shared papers)Min‐Sun Kim (4 shared papers)Kenneth Pearlman (12 shared papers)Jack M. Feldman (1 shared paper)David W. Gerbing (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Psychology (57 papers)Personnel Psychology (16 papers)Psychological Bulletin (11 papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (6 papers)Human Communication Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
John E. Hunter
279 papers receiving 25.3k citations
John E. Hunter's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 232
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 5.6k
- Applied Psychology 2.4k
- Social Psychology 6.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.7k
- General Decision Sciences 421
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Hunter
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Hunter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Hunter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Hunter. The network helps show where John E. Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Hunter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 293 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 2525 |
| 2 | Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 2227 |
| 3 | Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Hit paper breakdown → | 1991 | 1921 |
| 4 | THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 1756 |
| 5 | Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 1105 |
| 6 | Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 1044 |
| 7 | Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 1026 |
| 8 | General Mental Ability in the World of Work: Occupational Attainment and Job Performance. Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 787 |
| 9 | Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance Hit paper breakdown → | 1986 | 712 |
| 10 | Fixed Effects vs. Random Effects Meta‐Analysis Models: Implications for Cumulative Research Knowledge Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 683 |
| 11 | Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies Hit paper breakdown → | 1986 | 681 |
| 12 | Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Hit paper breakdown → | 1977 | 572 |
| 13 | Relationships Among Attitudes, Behavioral Intentions, and Behavior Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 557 |
| 14 | Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Hit paper breakdown → | 1986 | 555 |
| 15 | 1996 | 427 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 403 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 323 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 304 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 282 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 268 |
About John E. Hunter
John E. Hunter is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 293 papers that have together received 28.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (20 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (19 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (15 papers), Emotional Intelligence and Performance (12 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (12 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (5.6k citations), Applied Psychology (2.4k citations), Social Psychology (6.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.7k citations) and General Decision Sciences (421 citations). John E. Hunter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Frank L. Schmidt, Frank L. Schmidt, Stephen W. Raudenbush, Gregg B. Jackson, Min‐Sun Kim, Kenneth Pearlman, Jack M. Feldman, David W. Gerbing, Robert Rodgers and Michael A. McDaniel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, Psychological Bulletin, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Human Communication Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.