Donald T. Campbell
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 0.05%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Psychology top 0.02%
- Cultural Differences and Values
Papers in
-
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 13
-
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment 11
- Psychometric Methodologies and Testing 9
- Co-authors
- Thomas D. Cook (3 shared papers)Donald W. Fiske (3 shared papers)Julian C. Stanley (2 shared papers)Nathaniel L. Gage (1 shared paper)William R. Shadish (1 shared paper)Robert A. Levine (12 shared papers)Donald L. Thistlethwaite (1 shared paper)Philip Brickman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Psychologist (9 papers)Psychological Bulletin (6 papers)Journal of Applied Psychology (5 papers)The Journal of Social Psychology (4 papers)Zygon® (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsNorway
In The Last Decade
Donald T. Campbell
166 papers receiving 49.6k citations
Donald T. Campbell's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- Applied Psychology 3.0k
- Social Psychology 9.9k
- General Psychology 577
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 5.6k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 4.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Donald T. Campbell
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald T. Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald T. Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald T. Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald T. Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald T. Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald T. Campbell. The network helps show where Donald T. Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald T. Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 176 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Hit paper breakdown → | 1959 | 12552 |
| 2 | Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research Hit paper breakdown → | 1963 | 10775 |
| 3 | Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 9327 |
| 4 | Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings Hit paper breakdown → | 1979 | 8710 |
| 5 | Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Hit paper breakdown → | 1960 | 1366 |
| 6 | Reforms as experiments. Hit paper breakdown → | 1969 | 1249 |
| 7 | Ethnocentrism: theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior Hit paper breakdown → | 1971 | 1209 |
| 8 | Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Hit paper breakdown → | 1960 | 931 |
| 9 | Hedonic relativism and planning the good society Hit paper breakdown → | 1971 | 745 |
| 10 | Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Hit paper breakdown → | 1957 | 739 |
| 11 | Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 721 |
| 12 | III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study Hit paper breakdown → | 1975 | 668 |
| 13 | On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. Hit paper breakdown → | 1975 | 642 |
| 14 | The Informant in Quantitative Research Hit paper breakdown → | 1955 | 597 |
| 15 | Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. Hit paper breakdown → | 1960 | 459 |
| 16 | The influence of culture on visual perception Hit paper breakdown → | 1966 | 454 |
| 17 | 1979 | 446 | |
| 18 | A Primer on Regression Artifacts | 1999 | 364 |
| 19 | Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences | 1981 | 327 |
| 20 | Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. Hit paper breakdown → | 1967 | 261 |
About Donald T. Campbell
Donald T. Campbell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 176 papers that have together received 58.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (13 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (9 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (9 papers), Community Health and Development (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (3.0k citations), Social Psychology (9.9k citations), General Psychology (577 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (5.6k citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (4.5k citations). Donald T. Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Thomas D. Cook, Donald W. Fiske, Julian C. Stanley, Nathaniel L. Gage, William R. Shadish, Robert A. Levine, Donald L. Thistlethwaite, Philip Brickman, Marshall H. Segall and Melville J. Herskovits. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology and Zygon®.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.