Jian Ming

4.1k citations
148 papers · 3.3k · h-index 38

Impact in

  • Food Science top 0.5%
    • Proteins in Food Systems
    • Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
    • Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities

Papers in

Jian Ming

131 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Jian Ming
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Food Science 1.2k
  • Biochemistry 392
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 588
  • Biomaterials 333
  • Plant Science 938
Replace Jian‐Guo Zhang with:
Jian‐Guo Zhang China
Wuyang Huang China
Dorota Kręgiel Poland
Weicheng Hu China
Ye Zou China
Xinchun Shen China
Xin‐Huai Zhao China
Lei Zhao China
Anna Kulma Poland
Yue Sun China
Jian Ming relative to Jian‐Guo Zhang China Jian‐Guo Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jian‐Guo Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jian Ming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jian Ming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jian Ming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jian Ming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jian Ming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jian Ming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jian Ming. The network helps show where Jian Ming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jian Ming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jian Ming Line = papers co-authored together Jian Ming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 148 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010125
2 2011114
3 2011108
4 201992
5 201191
6 201986
7 201874
8 202174
9 201072
10 201271
11 201469
12 201665
13 202365
14 200964
15 200964
16 202264
17 201358
18 201455
19 202253
20 202451

About Jian Ming

Jian Ming is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Food Science, Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Biochemistry, having authored 148 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (18 papers), Food composition and properties (16 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (15 papers), Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (12 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (11 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (9 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (9 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.2k citations), Biochemistry (392 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (588 citations), Biomaterials (333 citations) and Plant Science (938 citations). Jian Ming has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kaifang Zeng, Guohua Zhao, Lili Deng, Fuhua Li, Jichun Zhao, Qiming Wang, Xiaojuan Lei, Shixiang Yao, Lin Lei and Yaxuan Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Postharvest Biology and Technology, Food Chemistry, Food Hydrocolloids, Foods and Food & Function.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact