Janet E. Keith

813 citations
18 papers · 627 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Keith

17 papers receiving 519 citations

Peers

Janet E. Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 396
  • Marketing 247
  • Management Information Systems 132
  • Strategy and Management 193
  • Information Systems and Management 79
Replace Thomas Tellefsen with:
Thomas Tellefsen United States
Lauranne Buchanan United States
Junyean Moon South Korea
Keith Fletcher United Kingdom
David A. Reid United States
William H. Murphy Canada
Bronislaw J. Verhage United States
James H. Donnelly United States
Ka‐shing Woo Hong Kong
G. Tomas United States
Janet E. Keith relative to Thomas Tellefsen United States Thomas Tellefsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Thomas Tellefsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Keith. The network helps show where Janet E. Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Keith Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 1990123
2 1984116
3 198575
4 199062
5 198445
6 198735
7 200433
8 201328
9 198525
10 200319
11 200117
12 199915
13 198511
14 200110
15 19948
16 20004
17 19851
18 19850

About Janet E. Keith

Janet E. Keith is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Management Information Systems and Information Systems and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (12 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Management and Marketing Education (2 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers) and Accounting Education and Careers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (396 citations), Marketing (247 citations), Management Information Systems (132 citations), Strategy and Management (193 citations) and Information Systems and Management (79 citations). Janet E. Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Latvia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Donald W. Jackson, Richard K. Burdick, Lawrence A. Crosby, John C. Mowen, Stephen Brown, Judy A. Wagner, Noreen M. Klein, Dong‐Jin Lee, John L. Schlacter and Stephen Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Global Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact