Janet E. Keith

694 citations
15 papers · 496 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Keith

15 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Janet E. Keith
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 288
  • Marketing 137
  • Management Information Systems 155
  • Strategy and Management 61
  • Business and International Management 3
Replace Gloria Penn Thomas with:
Gloria Penn Thomas United States
Daniel J. Goebel United States
Keysuk Kim United States
John R. Ronchetto United States
W.E. Patton United States
Bradley S. O′Hara United States
Bahar Ashnai United Kingdom
Peter F. Kaminski United States
Tian Ye-zhuang China
Scott M. Widmier United States
Janet E. Keith relative to Gloria Penn Thomas United States Gloria Penn Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Gloria Penn Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Keith. The network helps show where Janet E. Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Keith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Keith Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Keith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1990124
2 1984108
3 198570
4 198732
5 200430
6 201327
7 198525
8 200317
9 199915
10 200115
11 198511
12 20019
13 19948
14 20004
15 19851

About Janet E. Keith

Janet E. Keith is a scholar working on Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management Information Systems, General Decision Sciences and Strategy and Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence (4 papers), Employee Performance and Motivation (4 papers), Marketing and Advertising Strategies (4 papers), Quality and Supply Management (3 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (2 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (288 citations), Marketing (137 citations), Management Information Systems (155 citations), Strategy and Management (61 citations) and Business and International Management (3 citations). Janet E. Keith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Donald W. Jackson, Richard K. Burdick, Lawrence A. Crosby, John C. Mowen, Stephen Brown, Judy A. Wagner, Noreen M. Klein, Dong‐Jin Lee, Renée Gravois Lee and John L. Schlacter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing and Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact