James Ritchie

220 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Peers

James Ritchie
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Biological Psychiatry 728
  • Atmospheric Science 1.9k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 732
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 270
Replace Mu‐Hong Chen with:
Mu‐Hong Chen Taiwan
Brian R. Walker United Kingdom
Matthew Taylor United States
Ian A. Simpson United States
Katherine EO Todd-Brown United States
Caleb E. Finch United States
Gary W. Miller United States
Thomas N. Chase United States
Jonathan Cole United States
Bing Liu China
James Ritchie relative to Mu‐Hong Chen Taiwan Mu‐Hong Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Mu‐Hong Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Ritchie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Ritchie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Ritchie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Ritchie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Ritchie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Ritchie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Ritchie. The network helps show where James Ritchie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Ritchie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Ritchie Line = papers co-authored together James Ritchie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 224 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986399
2 1984299
3 2004265
4 2018251
5 1988239
6 1983218
7 1989184
8 1985183
9 2007182
10 1986139
11 2000136
12 1984132
13 2005124
14 1989122
15 2012122
16 1989122
17 2008118
18 1972118
19 1989117
20 1976113

About James Ritchie

James Ritchie is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Atmospheric Science, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 224 papers that have together received 9.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (38 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (24 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (17 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (15 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (15 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (13 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (11 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Biological Psychiatry (728 citations), Atmospheric Science (1.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (732 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (270 citations). James Ritchie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Charles B. Nemeroff, Zachary N. Stowe, D. Jeffrey Newport, Emily W. B. Russell, Glen M. MacDonald, Donald A. Walker, Michael J. Owens, Jeffrey R. Idle, Les C. Cwynar and Robert C. Spear. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Ecology and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact