Atmospheric Science

1.2M papers and 33.7M indexed citations i.

About

1.2M papers covering Atmospheric Science have received a total of 33.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols and Atmospheric Ozone and Climate and also cover the fields of Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography and Ecology. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Oceanography. Some of the most active scholars covering Atmospheric Science are Kerry Emanuel, P. D. Jones, Paul J. Crutzen, Edward N. Lorenz, John H. Seinfeld, Kevin E. Trenberth, Roger Atkinson, John W. Cahn, Meinrat O. Andreae and Bin Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Atmospheric Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Atmospheric Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Atmospheric Science.

Countries where authors publish papers about Atmospheric Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Atmospheric Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Atmospheric Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atmospheric Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025